Satellite Observation #2

I completed my second satellite observation at the BCC. I definitely preferred the environment to Bessey, but then again, Bessey has its positives.

The client had brought in his/her cover letter for a TA position, I believe, though it wasn't perfectly clear. The consultant asked him to explain exactly what he wanted his employer to know, and why he was the best person for the job. What the consultant was explaining to the tutor definitely didn't match up on paper. As we've been told numerous times in class, it's always necessary to have a conversation about the paper/piece of writing before even looking at it, and the client's eyes were already growing wide with realization as they discussed it.

The consultant had a pretty solid knowledge base for cover letter formats. The client had his stuff a little thrown around and not in super-logical order, such as the addresses and the "Enclosed/Attached" part, so the consultant asked where the client thought the employer would look first.

I liked that this session was non-directive. With things such as resumes and cover letters, one can get really carried away rattling off the strict formatting and page limit standards, but the consultant was continuously asking the client what he thought the employer might want or what specific information and details he wanted to convey most. The consultant did spend a bit of time going over cover letter rhetoric — such that it's sometimes the only thing employers will look at, so you have to make it eye-catching — but the consultant wasn't long-winded about it.

I really appreciated the different atmosphere. The session wasn't radically different from what I've done/seen at Bessey/the library, but the people here seemed different, with (obviously) different writing goals in mind. And, naturally, different people comprise a writing center specified for a certain group of students.

Good times!

Client and Satellite Observations

I had my second session as a client today, once again at the Library. I’m definitely coming to appreciate the later hours that branch has open, given my hectic schedule. For this meeting, I brought in a copy of my resume to go over. We’ve been working on them in class, and I wanted to make some improvements before I handed it in. Since I switched into Professional Writing relatively recently, I’m somewhat self-conscious about what I perceive as a dearth of relevant PW experience. One of the first things the consultant encouraged me to think about was how my various experiences could be spun to seem more significant. As we discussed the points I had included, she inspired me to think about what I had left out, or what I could explain in greater detail. More than just helping with documenting my experiences, she genuinely made me feel better about my accomplishments. I’ve gained some valuable insight into how I can present myself and my experiences to potential employers.

Given how closely form and function are intertwined in a resume, I appreciate the attention to detail the consultant paid. In each area, she urged me to think about my word choices, and to see if I could use more active words, or more concise language. We also talked about the layout and appearance of my document. Though it was already much improved from my earlier version, she provided valuable insight as to how I could make further design changes. It is fortunate that she had suggestions for increasing the amount of content that I could include. Before we began, I felt like my resume was practically empty, but after our discussion, I don’t know if I’ll be able to include everything!

I also had the opportunity to observe a session while at the Library. I immediately noticed that the consultant was consistent in her use of “I” statement when she responded to the student’s paper. She described her reactions in phrases like “I’m confused about this…” or “What’s I’m hearing you say is…” These are phrases that the Bedford Guide urges tutors to use, and I myself try to remember. I was also impressed by the way the consultant addressed issues of grammar and mechanics. Without overly fixating on them, she nevertheless managed to correct grammatical issues by clearly explaining the underlying principles. She also did an admirable job of explaining how the connotations of certain words changed the meaning of the student’s statements. In all, she actively engaged the student in a continuous dialogue to get her to think about her reasoning and objectives. Rather than simply identifying a problem, she talked the student through possible solutions.

This was my second time visiting the Library Satellite, but the last time I was there I wasn’t focused on the environment itself. This time I noticed how open the work area felt. I kept noticing people as they passed by. Surprisingly, despite all the foot traffic, the atmosphere seemed quieter than at the Bessey Center. Perhaps that’s because there weren’t a dozen people sitting in one small area, all holding separate conversations at the same time. It’s not that the main center is loud, but trying to filter out all those other conversations can be difficult. I can definitely sympathize with students who have ADHD who come to us for help. Something else I noticed was the difference made by not having a dedicated receptionist. When a new client came, rather than addressing one of the unoccupied consultants, he simply came to the closest one, even though she was working with another student. If all the tutors had been working with students, I could understand this. However, given that there were several available consultants, this seemed unnecessarily disruptive. I can see how this could be frustrating for a consultant. Perhaps there could be a sign posted, indicating how students can check the schedule to see who their appointment is with.